Anja Wildgruber vs Chelsea Fontenel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Mar at 01:46 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
A. Wildgruber vs C. Fontenel

GER
0
Win
Played
1
Win

SUI
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Wildgruber 0 - 1 Fontenel
They have played 2 sets in total, with Anja Wildgruber winning 0 and Chelsea Fontenel winning 2. The last match between Chelsea Fontenel and Anja Wildgruber was at the W15 Alaminos, 12-03-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Chelsea Fontenel getting the victory 6-3 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Wildgruber | 0 |
| Fontenel | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Alaminos(03-12-25)
A. Wildgruber vs C. Fontenel H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 53.33% (184-161) | Career Total W/L | 46.51% (60-69) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
A. Wildgruber vs C. Fontenel Match Preview:
In evaluating the impending tennis clash, Wildgruber and Fontenel present intriguing comparisons across various performance metrics. Second serve performance over the past six months indicates that Wildgruber has secured 40.68% of points, compared to Fontenel's 38.42%. This serves as a crucial predictor for match success given its strong correlation with match prediction accuracy.
Both players exhibit closely matched return game statistics in recent form, with Wildgruber winning 45.87% of opponents' second serve points, while Fontenel does slightly better at 47.77%. Regarding first serve returns, Wildgruber's 34.25% just edges out Fontenel's 32.65%, providing insight into who might be favored in this head-to-head matchup.
Under pressure, the breakpoint saving ability reveals minor variances between the two: Wildgruber has saved 48.76% of breakpoints, marginally behind Fontenel's 49.18%. Such statistics prove valuable for those engaged in in-game betting. Notably, Wildgruber displays superior performance in conversion of breakpoint opportunities, at 39.2%, as opposed to Fontenel's more impressive 47.06% conversion rate.
Overall performance statistics over the last year indicate that Wildgruber has claimed 45.31% of matches (W/L 29/35), edging Fontenel, who has won 40% (W/L 12/18), offering an overall predictive head-to-head perspective. These statistics underscore the relative strength Wildgruber may bring into this match.
Surface preferences reveal that Wildgruber's top performance appears on I.hard surfaces, boasting a 75% win rate (W/L 6/2), whereas their clay success drops to 46% (W/L 44/51). Fontenel shines best on Hard surfaces with a 48% win rate (W/L 21/23), although they struggle on Clay with a 36% win rate (W/L 8/14), outlining potential surface-based advantages for Wildgruber.
Analyzing player level and opponent quality, Wildgruber has predominantly competed on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, securing a 46.55% win rate (W/L 27/31), compared to Fontenel, who has primarily battled within the Challengers/ITF tournaments, securing a slightly lower 41.38% win rate (W/L 12/17). Both players have faced similarly ranked opposition, with Wildgruber confronting average ranks of 441.33, while Fontenel's competitors averaged 435.63.
Deciding set performance is telling for live predictions: Wildgruber demonstrates a commanding 77% victory rate in deciding sets over the past year, overshadowing Fontenel’s less impressive 33% win rate in similar scenarios.
Compiling all this data, the slight edge in performance statistics, particularly in deciding set scenarios and surface dominance, suggests Wildgruber holds a predicted advantage in the upcoming match against Fontenel.
Anja Wildgruber vs Chelsea Fontenel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
A. Wildgruber vs C. Fontenel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 3 | Games Won | 12 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:21:5 | Average Match Time | 1:21:5 |
| 57% (34/60) | 1st Serve % | 64% (28/44) |
| 41% (14/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (19/28) |
| 35% (9/26) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (7/16) |
| 29% (2/7) | Break Pts Won % | 64% (7/11) |
| 41% (18/44) | Return Points Win % | 62% (37/60) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
A. Wildgruber Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | L | 6-1 7-6(4) | ||
Q3 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 5-7 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 6-2 | ||
C. Fontenel Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-0 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-3 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||

A. Wildgruber vs C. Fontenel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.33% (184/161) | YTD Win/Loss | 46.51% (60/69) |
| 51.79% (404/376) | Sets Win/Loss | 47.12% (139/156) |
| 50.44% (3618/3555) | Games Win/Loss | 49.40% (1370/1403) |
| 55.20% (122/99) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.83% (22/24) |
| 48.11% (51/55) | Clay Win/Loss | 44.64% (25/31) |
| 61.11% (11/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48.15% (13/14) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 330 | Aces Total | 194 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 872 | Total Double Faults | 264 |
| 1:15:45 | Average Match Time | 1:22:32 |
| 460.92 | Average Opponent Rank | 453.25 |
| 68% (12093/17908) | 1st Serve % | 65% (4267/6571) |
| 57% (6937/12093) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (2539/4267) |
| 43% (2497/5815) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1020/2303) |
| 48% (1103/2308) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (354/782) |
| 46% (8325/18108) | Return Points Win % | 44% (2929/6593) |
| 40.43% (19/28) | Challenger W/L | 46.30% (50/58) |
| 55.37% (165/133) | Futures W/L | 47.62% (10/11) |
| 53% (181/342) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (59/126) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 48% (30/63) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 65% (13/20) |
| 58% (52/89) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (20/40) |
| 88% (173/153) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 84% (58/49) |
| 12% (173/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (58/8) |
| 17% (172/30) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (71/10) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Potential H2H Matches This Week
Wildgruber (W35 Sharm ElSheikh)
Fontenel (W35 Sharm ElSheikh)
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Anastasija Sevastova vs Barbora Krejcikova Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 9th December 2025 Best Bets

Open BLS de Limoges – Limoges Preview And Prediction: Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Katarzyna Kawa Betting Tips & Picks December 9, 2025

Open BLS de Limoges – Limoges Preview And Prediction: Tiantsoa Rakotomanga Rajaonah vs Jessika Ponchet Betting Tips & Picks December 10, 2025

Cristina Bucsa vs Teodora Kostovic Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 8th December 2025 Best Bets

Eva Vedder vs Alycia Parks Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 8th December 2025 Best Bets
